SYNOPSICS
Small Town Folk (2007) is a English movie. Peter Stanley-Ward has directed this movie. Chris Ryle Wright,Warwick Davis,Dan Palmer,Simon Stanley-Ward are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2007. Small Town Folk (2007) is considered one of the best Comedy,Fantasy,Horror,Thriller movie in India and around the world.
There is a place... a place called Grockleton, wherein, high on a hill-top stands the lonely Beesley's Manor, governed by the villainous 'Landlord' and his lowly male counterparts (Pooch, Pike and the diesel-swilling Dobbin). Always on the look-out for new female company to help carry on the Beesley name, the Landlord keeps a watchful eye over Grockleton and anyone who dares to enter his land. When three improbable heroes stumble unsuspectingly into the Beesley's realm they are cruelly snared into a menacing hunt and an unstoppable frenzy of heart racing mayhem! Will the Landlord triumph and collect his 'trophies' (and maybe even a future bride?), or can the unlikely trio be victorious against him in his own game?
More
Small Town Folk (2007) Reviews
Transgression
This is a transgression. Not only is this movie stupid, but the people who made it are too, and *I can prove it*. Read on. At the time of writing, there are *nine* 10/10 reviews. There's just the fact SIX of them are totally fake, two of them are possibly fake and the ninth, unless fake, is completely wrong. The proof? Well, out of the group of six fakes, there are *three* from UK, submitted between 27 Jun 2008 and 4 Jul 2008, and the other *three* from US, submitted between 7 Apr 2011 and 4 May 2011. ALL SIX reviewers have reviewed *only* this movie. That amounts to just too much convenient "coincidental" timing to be believable, the logical conclusion being that these six reviews are written by people affiliated with this "production". Occam's Razor, people! Of the two possibly fake reviews, one reviewer has only three reviews on IMDb and the other one has six. The ninth reviewer has 30 reviews, but then again, they may not understand the concept of a review. My question to the group of six (or three with two IMDb accounts each) reviewers is: How stupid do you think people are? OK, I now actually get to do the review proper, but it will be short. The "script" is primary school grade. The "acting" is primary school grade. The term "directing" doesn't even apply here. The "cinematography" is just a crime against all proper cinematographers and the almost omnipresent blue-screen work is atrocious. It's so incredibly horrible that at least once a minute one has to watch away before it becomes unbearable, since the "editing" is so sluggish it offers no variety. As someone who doesn't judge anyone hastily, I did indeed endure this "movie" from start to finish. If you haven't, for your sanity's sake, please avoid this garbage. A rare *true* 1/10 "movie", with no redeeming values whatsoever. Watch Bad Taste instead to see how Classic ultra-low budget horror comedy is made.
I love B movies.. But this one..
I love all kind of B movies, everything from a B-Zombie film to a B-Horror film. But this one.... It was so bad, i just want my money back. The acting was bad, and not like OK bad, it was like watching some elementary kids giving out the lines. The the "plot" was very predictable and well.. just bad. I wont spoil anything but the whole movie is filmed in a studio, behind a big, fat blue screen. The opening sceen is showing some young adults driving around in the nowhere. But guess what, it's filmed in blue screen. They just had to use the Bluescreen to every scene in the whole movie. After seeing this i just wanna punch myself in the face for renting it, but i had some good laugh (due the bad acting) and because of that i rate it 2/10. And i apologize for bad spelling.
Can't believe how bad it is!
I love B movies and respect them for what they are, so it's rare for me to be so disappointed! And being a hardcore fan of horror movies only made me feel worse. The opening credits are nice and a good promise they break as soon as the movie begins. The acting is terrible, the blue screen is irritating, the dialogue is stupid and the plot would be enjoyable (not smart, but good enough) if it was well handled. This is so poorly filmed that made my eyes hurt. Never felt this before, not even watching "Boo" which was my least favorite movie ever before this crossed my way! But if you want to laugh and don't have sensitive eyes, go for it!
Somebody Shoot Me... Please
This will be one of the biggest wastes of time, it will annoy you and you will regret your decision. I can't think of another reason someone would produce this pile of s--- unless they were just sadistic, talentless freaks with too much money or time on their hands. I kept waiting for some kind of twist or plot development that would make it worth watching and it never happened. It's starts out with some promise, or inklings that their may be something good coming.. BUT IT NEVER HAPPENS. It gets worse and worse and worse as the movie goes, right up until the end when you realize you will never get the time back that you lost watching it. There is NOTHING REDEEMING ABOUT THIS MOVIE.
Explain to me this......
In the original release of this film, was it in 3D? Because if it wasn't, then the use of CG in this film is an abortion. I LOVE bad horror flicks, but this one so far is just freaking lame. I was obviously tricked by cleaver marketing folks at Blockbuster, because all over the box it was billed how this film was some kind of visionary masterpiece, but it is far from it. The parts that are supposed to be funny, aren't even that. Trust me, I am not someone who takes these films too seriously, after all, 'Troll 2' is one of my fav films. But this film isn't even bad enough to be "so bad it's good" BOOOOOO this title!!!!!